For portfolios that are not fully diversified, what matters is the total risk, rather than the systematic risk alone. In such cases, the Sharpe ratio is a more appropriate performance measure than the Treynor ratio. A Treynor Ratio of 0.5 indicates that for every unit of market risk, your portfolio is earning half a unit of excess return over the risk-free rate. It’s quite a solid performance, especially if the market is volatile. By focusing on systematic risk, it provides clear insights into whether a portfolio is delivering adequate returns for the level of market risk it carries. Both methodologies work for determining a «better performing portfolio» by considering the risk, making it more suitable than raw performance analysis.
Strategic Portfolio Adjustments
- It offers insight into how efficiently a portfolio’s manager is balancing risk and return and can be useful for comparing portfolios or funds that might have different risk levels.
- Then, you divide that result by the portfolio’s beta.
- Avoid using it when your portfolio includes too many isolated or sector-specific assets.
- In these cases, unsystematic risks, like company-specific or sector-specific volatility, are assumed to be minimized or eliminated.
- Moreover, we assume that the beta on the equity portfolio and fixed income portfolio is 1.40 and 0.8 respectively.
A portfolio can show a strong Treynor score but still move wildly in the short CFD Trading term. You may not like that if you prefer stable returns. Treynor Ratio helps you judge performance in that case.
Create a free account to unlock this Template
If the beta changes often or flips negative, your result becomes unreliable. You get a number that no longer reflects the actual risk. Past returns won’t always tell you what comes next. Are you comparing managers or funds that track the same benchmark?
Treynor Ratio Performance Measurement
The Treynor Ratio and the Sharpe Ratio are both measures used to evaluate the performance of an investment portfolio, but they differ in how they account for risk. This written/visual material is comprised of personal opinions and ideas and may not reflect those of the Company. The content should not be construed as containing any type of investment advice and/or a solicitation for any transactions. It does not imply an obligation to purchase investment services, nor does it guarantee or predict future performance. Our platform may not offer all the products or services mentioned. However, a higher Treynor Ratio generally indicates better risk-adjusted performance.
The Equity Portfolio’s total return is 7%, and the Fixed Income Portfolio’s total return is 5%. As a proxy for the risk-free rate, we use the return on U.S Treasury Bills – 2%. Assume that the Beta of the Equity Portfolio is 1.25, and the Fixed Income Portfolio’s Beta is 0.7. From the following information, we compute the Treynor Ratio of each portfolio. Suppose you are comparing two portfolios, an Equity Portfolio and a Fixed Income Portfolio. You’ve done extensive research on both portfolios and can’t decide which one is a better investment.
Treynor Ratio, Importance, Formula and Disadvantages
The Sharpe ratio metric is useful for all portfolios, unlike the Treynor ratio, which can only be applied to well-diversified portfolios. The Sharpe ratio reveals how well a portfolio performs compared to a riskless investment. The common benchmarks used to represent a riskless investment are the U.S. As we have seen, investors must find mutual funds to help them meet their investment objectives at the required risk level.
As a financial analyst, it is important to not rely on a single ratio for your investment decisions. Other financial metrics should be considered before making a final decision. Please note that content is a marketing communication. Before making investment decisions, you should seek out independent financial advisors to help you understand the risks. You use it when you care more about losses than swings.
This ratio focuses on systematic risk, making it useful for evaluating diversified portfolios that are primarily exposed to market volatility. Its limitations include not accounting for unsystematic risk and being dependent on the risk-free rate. It is mostly effectively used in conjunction with other risk-adjusted performance metrics. This formula reflects that the Treynor ratio is concerned with both portfolio return and its systematic risk, and shows excess returns per unit of systematic risk.
This article will break down the Treynor Ratio, showing you how to compute it, apply it in real-world scenarios, and understand what the results mean for your investments. A higher Treynor ratio should result in greater expected risk-adjusted returns — all else being equal. For example, if a stock has been giving the firm a 12% rate of return for the past several years, it is not guaranteed that it will go on doing the same thing in the years to follow. The rate of return can go either way, which is not considered by the Treynor ratio. To carry out the Treynor Ratio calculations, we also need the risk-free rate of the three investments.
How to Find Beta And Risk-Free Rate?
This is not an offer to buy or sell any security or interest. All investing involves risk, including loss of principal. Working with an adviser may come with potential downsides, such as payment of fees (which will reduce returns). Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.
This difference in the results came because of the use of the measure of the risk in the Treynor ratio calculation. The β value can be measured, keeping the value of 1 as a benchmark. The β value for the whole market is taken equal to 1. A portfolio with a high number of volatile stocks will have a beta value greater than 1. On the other hand, if an investment has only a few volatile stocks, the β value of that investment will be less than one, indicating a negative Treynor ratio. The Treynor ratio is calculated by subtracting the risk-free rate such as a government bond yield from the portfolio’s return, then dividing this figure by the portfolio’s beta.
How Often Should You Calculate the Treynor Ratio for Your Portfolio?
Beta shows how much your portfolio reacts to overall market moves. A higher beta means more exposure to market risk. The Treynor ratio is thought of the best performance measure for a diversified portfolio and is used to analyze and manage the systematic risk. Further, this ratio is helpful vis-à-vis managing investment decisions to improve and optimize portfolio returns. A higher Treynor ratio suggests the portfolio is delivering more return per unit of market risk, while a lower ratio could indicate insufficient compensation for the risk taken.
Are you trying to improve your portfolio’s performance? So, use Treynor as a part of a smarter strategy. He was one of the minds behind the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM). He focused on measuring return in a way that accounts for risk linked to the whole market.
This allows for an apples-to-apples comparison of how well each portfolio performs relative to its exposure to market movements. When two portfolios have similar market sensitivity but varying returns, the Treynor ratio helps determine which one is delivering better risk-adjusted performance relative to the market. The Treynor ratio is a risk-adjusted metric that evaluates portfolio performance in relation to systematic risk, also called market risk. Named after American economist Jack Treynor, this ratio is calculated by dividing the excess return of a portfolio over the risk-free rate by its beta. In essence, the Treynor ratio is a risk-adjusted measurement of return based on systematic risk.
- It works well for portfolios that aim to protect capital.
- Our platform may not offer all the products or services mentioned.
- Ultimately, comparing the Treynor ratio of a portfolio to similar investments or benchmarks provides a more accurate gauge of performance.
- Developed by Jack Treynor, this ratio helps investors compare the efficiency of different portfolios or funds by analyzing returns per unit of market risk, represented by beta.
She holds a Bachelor of Science in Finance degree from Bridgewater State University and helps develop content strategies. Get market insights, education, and platform updates from the Volity team. The Treynor ratio was developed by American economist Jack L. Treynor, a key figure in the development of the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM). You need two key inputs to calculate the Treynor Ratio. Get the latest insights & exclusive offers delivered straight to your inbox.
For example, if you have two portfolios with Treynor Ratios of 0.1 and 0.2, the one with 0.2 delivers twice the return per unit of risk compared to the one with 0.1. This is generally a positive sign and suggests that the portfolio is being managed efficiently, with returns that justify the level of risk involved. While the Sharpe ratio measures all elements within the total portfolio risk (i.e. systematic and unsystematic), the Treynor ratio only captures the systematic component. But since the ratio is derived using historical data and past performance, it is an imperfect indicator of future performance (and should be evaluated alongside other relevant metrics). The Treynor ratio and the Jensen alpha share the flaw that they depend on beta estimates, which can vary greatly depending on the source, resulting in an inaccurate risk-adjusted return calculation.